Category: Uncategorized

  • What?! They want to pave 58 North Passaic Avenue??

    Despite growing public opposition, the Mayor & Council still aim to sacrifice the wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic Avenue – right next to Memorial Park –  without having considered the alternatives!

    Will you stand for that?

    ”It’s as green as Kermit the Frog.”

    Tell the Mayor & Council:

    • You’re with the 90% of Chathamites who want to preserve that green lot for the benefit and enjoyment of current and future generations.
    • It is irresponsible to sacrifice that precious parcel without having carefully considered each of the potential alternative sites.
    • Residents deserve a chance to weigh in on the alternatives before they make decisions like this one, that will permanently change Chatham Borough

    cdempsey@chathamborough.org jmathiasen@chathamborough.org

    kkoronkiewicz@chathamborough.org

    itreloar@chathamborough.org

    jstrickland@chathamborough.org     bhargrove@chathamborough.org

    khay@chathamborough.org

    Show you care by stopping by the next Council meeting:

    • Tuesday, 14 October 2025, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave.
    • Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level.
    • Arrive when convenient. Stay only as long as you please.
    • Speaking is optional.

    What the heck is the above all about?

    Last spring, residents flatly rejected a Master Plan amendment, hastily developed behind closed doors, which included needlessly sacrificing the green parcel at 58 North Passaic to help satisfy the Borough’s new affordable housing quota. 

    Residents urged the Council to consider alternatives that could satisfy that quota, while also preserving that green land for current and future generations.

    https://www.tapinto.net/towns/chatham/sections/government/articles/chatham-residents-question-green-space-borough-land-being-used-on-north-passaic-for-affordable-housing-without-public-input

    On June 18th, the Planning Board rubber stamped the take-it-or-leave-it plan. Though the Borough’s experts noted that the Council could later nominate alternative sites, some Council members insisted that the plan was a done deal.

    https://chathamchoice.org/2025/08/sworn-testimony/

    https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=396 (See comments starting 1:43:24 and approx. 2:11:00.)

    But then two informal Facebook polls revealed that more than 90% of Chathamites want that wooded, Borough-owned parcel preserved for the benefit of current and future generations.  

    Screenshot

    And now a growing chorus of residents is stepping forward to implore the Council to come up with alternatives that could preserve that precious public land. Several attended the September 8th Council meeting. 

    https://www.newjerseyhills.com/chatham_courier/news/residents-bring-affordable-housing-complaints-to-chatham-borough-council/article_dc9c8141-650f-4f6d-abfa-9c60a2ae6410.html

    https://www.tapinto.net/towns/chatham/categories/news/articles/chatham-borough-s-fourth-round-affordable-housing-plan-faces-three-challenges-in-court-filings-court-mediator-to-be-assigned

    The looming threat to 58 North Passaic Avenue has become an issue in the current race for Borough Council.

    Incumbent Council Member Karen Koronkiewicz (who co-designed the plan) suggested that the Borough might be able to build four apartments on the small lot at 58 North Passaic without chopping down most or all of the trees there.

    ”If you’re going to build four apartments,” scoffed challenger Joe Barrette, “you have to cut the trees down.”

    He’s right about that, as the below aerial views of 58 North Passaic demonstrate. The first shows the site, almost covered what trees, and the second, which shows what the Council aims to build there, states that it will preserve ONE such tree.

    Screenshot

    At the September 10th debate, first time candidate Miles Gilmore, a member of the Shade Tree Commission, professed little understanding of the housing issue. He proved it by speaking eloquently in favor of protecting the trees at 58 North Passaic, while advocating acquiescence to the Council’s current plan, which will make it necessary to chop down virtually all of them.

    Let’s hope Mr. Gilmore will look into the housing plan, and realize that the only way to preserve those trees is to preserve 58 North Passaic and put the new apartments elsewhere in the Borough.

  • Unmask the duds!

    UPDATE: We influenced the debate last night. We can influence the outcome. See the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySa2jw-mXCM

    You want better leaders in Chatham Borough? Unmask the duds!

    Suss out their true colors before Election Day by making the candidates answer tough questions.

    Start at the League of Women Voters candidate debate, which is set for this Wednesday evening, September 10th, at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue in Chatham Borough.

    Submit your questions here: https://forms.gle/Cs4HnQoN1wMBMSiJ9

    If that link has expired, show up at the debate a bit early (around 6:30 or so) to submit your questions on index cards. (See Barbara.)

    That’s this Wednesday evening, September 10th, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue. (Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level.)

  • The only way to find out

    Counting on local news outlets for timely coverage of important issues?

    Don’t hold your breath.

    The only way to find out about crucial local issues before it’s too late is to monitor ChathamChoice.org and public comments at Borough Council meetings, like the one on Monday, September 8, 2025, 7:30 pm at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. [Start at minute 44:06 here: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=413]

    What can you learn there that isn’t in the local paper? Plenty.

    Will the Borough Council let residents have a say on whether to sacrifice the wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic, right next to Memorial Park, or develop four apartments at a less environmentally sensitive location? https://chathamchoice.org/2025/08/good-news-2/

    Will a judge scuttle the Borough’s new, ten-year housing plan and force the Borough to waive local rules to let rich developers run amok, including building 43 additional apartments at the Cottage Deli and the auto shop in Post Office Plaza, among other things? https://chathamchoice.org/2025/08/second-bite/

    Go to Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue, on Monday, September 8, 2025, anytime after 7:30 pm.

    You’ll find plenty of free parking in the lot and on the street. Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level. Stay only as long as you wish. Speaking is optional.

  • Second bite

    In 2022, three real estate developers barged into Superior Court and demanded that the judge force Chatham Borough to let them build a 100+ unit apartment project on public parking lots and private land in Post Office Plaza, including the Cottage Deli property. https://chathamchoice.org/2022/06/what-now/

    The judge refused. Instead of forcing the Borough to accept a large apartment building, he allowed the Borough to substitute a 15-unit, 100% affordable apartment house on one of the public parking lots at Post Office Plaza. https://chathamchoice.org/2022/11/great-news/

    End of story? Nope.

    On Wednesday, one of those developers went back into court, seeking to force the Borough to let them replace the Cottage Deli and its next-door-neighbor with a four-story, 43-unit, 15% affordable apartment project, as part of the Borough’s Fourth Round affordable housing obligation.

    See it here:

    Challenge filed 27 August 2025 by Vertical Realty, owner of 23 S. Passaic Avenue (0.4098 acres, block 121/lot 13) and 33 South Passaic Avenue (0.24 acres, block 121/lot 12):

    [Vertical’s 27 October follow-up to the response filed by Chatham Borough:

    Since then, two more challengers have filed formal objections to the Borough’s housing plan, demanding that the Court scuttle and revamp it:

    Challenge filed 2 September 2025 by Danbro Properties, would-be developer of 45 River Road (0.2045 acres, block 140/lot 5) and 55 River. Road (0.2394 acres, block 139/lot 4.)

    Check out this Challenge filed 29 August 2025 by Fair Share Housing Center:

    Case Docket:

    Who will decide those challenges? https://www.njcourts.gov/courts/civil/affordable-housing

    What do those challenges mean for Chatham Borough? Ask the Mayor: https://www.chathamborough.org/government/mayor

    Stop by the next Borough Council meeting, 7:30 pm, Monday, September 8, 2025 at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue. (Use the north entrance; take the elevator to the upper level.)

  • Sworn Testimony

    Myth: It’s over. Chatham Borough must sacrifice the vacant, Borough-owned parcel at 58 North Passaic Avenue to build four apartments right next to Memorial Park.

    Reality: It isn’t over. Once the Judge has ruled on Chatham’s affordable housing plan, the Borough Council can propose an alternative site or project.

    Source: Sworn testimony of Chatham Borough Planner Kendra Lelie at the 18 June 2025 Planning Board Hearing on the new Housing Element of the Borough’s revised Master Plan:

    Q: Planning Board Member William Heap: Kendra, let’s say the Plan is adopted. It is approved. And somewhere down the line, somehow, magically, another piece of land appears. Is there room after approval for a little bit of horse trading? 

    A: Kendra Lelie: So, after the approval from the Court, it is not uncommon that things happen, things change… Maybe something better comes up – and a better opportunity comes up. So yes, it’s a possibility.

    https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=393 starting at 1:12:20.

  • Good news!

    Contrary to popular rumors, Chatham Borough need not build housing on the wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic Avenue, right next to our Memorial Park.

    But the Mayor & Council will sacrifice that green lot anyway unless you tell them not to!

    Starting 1 January 2026, the Borough can offer alternative ways to complete the new Housing Element of the Master Plan.

    That’s what Chatham Borough Planner Kendra Lelie said under oath at the 18 June 2025 Planning Board Hearing on the new Housing Element. See for yourself starting at 1:12:20 here: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=393

    Here’s a partial transcript:

    Q: Planning Board Member William Heap: Kendra, let’s say the Plan is adopted. It is approved. And somewhere down the line, somehow, magically, another piece of land appears. Is there room after approval for a little bit of horse trading? 

    A: Chatham Borough Planner Kendra Lelie: So, after the approval from the Court, it is not uncommon that things happen, things change… Maybe something better comes up – and a better opportunity comes up. So yes, it’s a possibility.

    What can you do? Ask the Mayor & Borough Council:

    1. What substantive steps have our Mayor & Council been taking to prepare to identify better alternatives to developing 58 North Passaic Avenue?
    2. When will the Mayor & Borough Council begin to search for better alternatives?
    3. This time, will the Mayor & Borough Council perform due diligence on all parcels, including sites the clandestine Affordable Housing Advisory Committee never gave proper consideration, as well as sites the Committee never considered at all?
    •    Email them:

    cdempsey@chathamborough.org.      jmathiasen@chathamborough.org

    kkoronkiewicz@chathamborough.org.     itreloar@chathamborough.org

    jstrickland@chathamborough.org       bhargrove@chathamborough.org

    • Stop by the Council meeting, Monday, 8 September 2025, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. (Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level. Speaking is optional.)
    • Sign the petition: https://chng.it/GN4yhK8sGT
    • Share the flyer:

    Flyer for 58 N. Passaic 8 13 25 Download

  • Is it too late?

    Is it too late to preserve the wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic Avenue, right next to home plate at Memorial Park? No!

    In case you haven’t heard, that lovely, green parcel is targeted for development under a controversial Master Plan amendment that also allows construction of up to 206 new apartments on the busy east end of Main Street. 

    In June, Hundreds of residents protested that plan, but to no avail.

    End of story? No.

    Once the Superior Court approves the plan, which should happen by the end of December, the Borough can propose substitute sites, according to the Borough’s Professional Planner. https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=393 (Go to 1:12:20)

    If the Mayor & Council choose instead to sacrifice 58 North Passaic without having considered all the alternatives, they will lose the chance to achieve a better outcome for Chatham Borough.

    To avoid that fate, the Mayor & Council must begin searching for better options immediately after Labor Day.

    •    Ask them:

    cdempsey@chathamborough.org.      jmathiasen@chathamborough.org

    kkoronkiewicz@chathamborough.org.     itreloar@chathamborough.org

    jstrickland@chathamborough.org       bhargrove@chathamborough.org

    khay@chathamborough.org.       mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org

    • Stop by the Council meeting, Monday, 8 September 2025, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. (Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level. Speaking is optional.)
    • Sign the petition: https://chng.it/GN4yhK8sGT
    • Share the flyer:

  • Will you help preserve one of Chatham’s few natural resources?

    Incredible but true: Our elected officials aim to sacrifice the little, green, wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic, right next to our Memorial Park, for two buildings, with four apartments and a parking lot.

    “It’s as green as Kermit the Frog.https://www.tapinto.net/towns/chatham/categories/letters-to-the-editor/articles/as-green-as-kermit-the-frog

    On June 18th, the Planning Board will approve that development unless enough residents start emailing questions today to mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org, and go to the Planning Board meeting this Wednesday, June 4, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue, Chatham.

    https://www.tapinto.net/towns/chatham/sections/government/articles/chatham-residents-question-green-space-borough-land-being-used-on-north-passaic-for-affordable-housing-without-public-input?fbclid=IwY2xjawKodJZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFaTjZNZ29aUVBUZ0w0OWV2AR575-CbLahYMja40NtUXgzske9a8WfO-byB44GylTHMZOZ-LCYsTULE4Fwnrw_aem_foI7DuyJVPFQ7WiMQ7RJgg

    The Borough had that nearly 0.3-acre site on its wish list for 25 years before putting up taxpayer dollars to buy it for recreation. Check out the following clips from the November 15, 1981 issue of The Chatham Press and the November 17, 1981 issue of the Morristown Record:

    Borough taxpayers shelled out $68,000 to acquire that land by deed dated March 31, 1982.

    Here’s the contract:

    Today 58 North Passaic Avenue is officially deemed a tax-exempt playground.

    That’s exactly the kind of property Chatham has long tried to preserve.

    https://chathamborough.org/government/documents/plans-reports/recreation-and-open-space/1298-2010-chatham-borough-open-space-recreation-plan/file#:~:text=Recreation%20Areas,Milton%20Avenue%20Woods%20are%20located.

    What’s more, the site is at the intersection of TWO official Wellhead Protection Areas:

    https://chathamborough.org/government/documents/forms-documents/maps/1263-chatham-borough-well-head-protection-area-overlay-zone/file

    Now the Council is trying to steamroll the Planning Board into sacrificing that green lot by cramming in a 4-unit housing project and parking lot, to satisfy 4/6 of the Borough’s new affordable housing quota.

    Screenshot

    The Borough needs to consider other ways to satisfy its housing quota so that we can preserve that green, grassy, treed, Borough-owned lot.

    You can help! Attend the Planning Board meeting on June 4, 7:30 pm, at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue. Chatham Borough. Use the north entrance and take the elevator to the upper level.

    Showing up shows you care, even if you arrive late and leave early. Speaking is optional. Please bring a friend.

    You won’t be able to ask questions if you Zoom the meeting, but it’s far better than not attending at all. Log in following the directions on the Borough home page www.chathamborough.org. Don’t log out even if you can’t pay attention.

    Really tied up on June 4? Email the Mayor & Council right now:

    mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org

    Cdempsey@chathamborough.org

    Jmathiasen@chathamborough.org

    Kkoronkiewicz@chathamborough.org

    Itreloar@chathamborough.org

    Jstrickland@chathamborough.org

    Bhargrove@chathamborough.org

    Khay@chathamborough.org

    https://www.tapinto.net/towns/chatham/categories/letters-to-the-editor/articles/what-is-happening-to-lovely-historic-charming-chatham

  • Myth vs. Reality

    Hearing conflicting claims about affordable housing? Like to separate the facts from spin & fiction?

    Free ice cream at Scoops, a slice at Bucky’s, or coffee at Fleur de Sel for the first person who can find a factual error in the following post.

    MYTH: Chatham Borough has a history of shirking its affordable housing obligations! 

    REALITY: Not so. The Borough has met its affordable housing quotas so far.

    MYTH: Before June 30, Chatham must agree to build affordable housing on the green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot at 58 N. Passaic, right next to Memorial Park, or else the Borough will risk lawsuits that would destroy the town! 

    REALITY: Not so.  Like virtually all other NJ municipalities, Chatham Borough has until the end of June to revise the Housing Element of its Master Plan to meet a new quota, but the Borough is NOT required to build anything on that particular green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park, and the Borough cannot be held liable for declining to let a developer build there.

    MYTH: The Planning Board must have had a good reason for choosing to develop that green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park!

    REALITY: No, the Planning Board did NOT select that lot for development. Only a few political bosses even heard about it before May 7, when a non-resident expert told the Planning Board about a proposal to change Borough policy by changing the Housing Element of the Master Plan, an amendment they won’t see until at least June 6, but will be steamrolled into adopting on June 18. Start approx. 46:00 here: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=368

    MYTH: The Borough Council must have had a good reason for choosing to develop that green, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park! 

    REALITY: The Council did NOT vote to select that lot for development. Half the Council never heard about it until a few days before the Planning Board first heard about it on May 7. The Council never even mentioned it in public until the May 12 Council meeting, when residents started asking questions. The Mayor said they couldn’t talk about it, but the reason, if any, was not clear. If the Council can’t discuss a change in Borough policy, who can?

    MYTH: There must be some explanation. Nobody would sacrifice a green, wooded, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park without having determined that it was the best – or only feasible – option. 

    REALITY: So far nobody’s shown any evidence that anybody considered any alternatives before targeting that green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park. The expert who presented the idea to the Planning Board said essentially, we owned that lot, and the developer wanted it, so we made a deal. Start approx. 1:09:00 here: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=368

    MYTH: The Environmental & Shade Tree Commissions must have approved targeting for development this green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned location right next to Memorial Park!

    REALITY: No, neither Commission was even consulted. The Environmental Commission members who aren’t also political bosses didn’t hear about it until residents broke the news to them at the May 14 meeting. The only person on the Shade Tree Commission who knew about it was Council member Karen Korenkiewicz, who kept mum about it until a resident shocked the Shade Tree Commission with the news at its May 22 meeting.

    MYTH: This wasn’t a secret, back-room deal, so there must be some record as to who chose that green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot and why!

    REALITY: On May 7th the expert told the Planning Board the proposal was the work of a certain “advisory committee.” But the committee she credited with developing the proposal has NO public meetings, NO agendas, NO minutes, and takes NO public input. It isn’t even on the list of advisory committees on the Borough website as of yesterday.

    MYTH:  They’re going to do what they’re going to do. You can’t make any difference! 

    REALITY: Yes you can make a difference. You did it with the rolling reassessment, the peddler curfew, Post Office plaza, and the Middle School Arts Center. You can do it again. Our local leaders tend to consider their actions far more carefully when faced with strong public interest in an issue.

    So whatever your views:

    • Talk to friends on the Council, Planning & Zoning Boards, and the Environmental & Shade Tree Commissions.
    • Write mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org and shadetree@chathamborough.org
    • Attend or Zoom the Council meeting on Tuesday, 5/27/25 and Planning Board meeting on 6/4/25, both at 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue, upper level.
    • Encourage everyone you know to do the same.
  • Who did this?

    Who is responsible for the Master Plan amendment our Planning Board won’t see until June 6, but is under pressure to adopt on June 18, setting Borough housing policy for the next ten years?

    Why did our Borough Council let someone concoct such a plan 100% behind closed doors, without any public input?

    Why does that plan include developing a vacant, green, woodsy, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park?

    58 N. Passaic Avenue

    Was it ok for our Borough Council to skip presenting that plan in public, skip voting on it, skip running it by the Shade Tree Commission or Environmental Commission, and instead simply pay a hired planner to present a summary to our Planning Board?

    Did the Council have an obligation to explain, release, or disclose the actual plan BEFORE turning it over to the Planning Board?

    Did having the planner tell the Planning Board about the plan really muzzle the Borough Council as claimed?

    Is the Planning Board required to approve the plan, which it won’t even see until at least June 6?

    If the Planning Board is required to rubber stamp the never-before-seen plan, which the Council has never voted on or even discussed in public, then who is responsible for the policy decisions that will guide local decision making for the next ten years?

    Why does the Council President say answering questions like that would expose her to “legal risk”?

    Ask her: Jmathiasen@chathamborough.org

    Ok with you if the Planning Board votes to develop that green, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to the park without having justified or explained that choice?

    Share your views:

    mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org

    shadetree@chathamborough.org

    https://www.tapinto.net/towns/chatham/sections/government/articles/chatham-residents-question-green-space-borough-land-being-used-on-north-passaic-for-affordable-housing-without-public-input