In 2022, three real estate developers barged into Superior Court and demanded that the judge force Chatham Borough to let them build a 100+ unit apartment project on public parking lots and private land in Post Office Plaza, including the Cottage Deli property. https://chathamchoice.org/2022/06/what-now/
The judge refused. Instead of forcing the Borough to accept a large apartment building, he allowed the Borough to substitute a 15-unit, 100% affordable apartment house on one of the public parking lots at Post Office Plaza. https://chathamchoice.org/2022/11/great-news/
End of story? Nope.
On Wednesday, one of those developers went back into court, seeking to force the Borough to let them replace the Cottage Deli and its next-door-neighbor with a four-story, 43-unit, 15% affordable apartment project, as part of the Borough’s Fourth Round affordable housing obligation.
See it here:
Challenge filed 27 August 2025 by Vertical Realty, owner of 23 S. Passaic Avenue (0.4098 acres, block 121/lot 13) and 33 South Passaic Avenue (0.24 acres, block 121/lot 12):
Stop by the next Borough Council meeting, 7:30 pm, Monday, September 8, 2025 at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue. (Use the north entrance; take the elevator to the upper level.)
Myth: It’s over. Chatham Borough must sacrifice the vacant, Borough-owned parcel at 58 North Passaic Avenue to build four apartments right next to Memorial Park.
Reality: It isn’t over. Once the Judge has ruled on Chatham’s affordable housing plan, the Borough Council can propose an alternative site or project.
Source:Sworn testimony of Chatham Borough Planner Kendra Lelie at the 18 June 2025 Planning Board Hearing on the new Housing Element of the Borough’s revised Master Plan:
Q: Planning Board Member William Heap: Kendra, let’s say the Plan is adopted. It is approved. And somewhere down the line, somehow, magically, another piece of land appears. Is there room after approval for a little bit of horse trading?
A: Kendra Lelie:So, after the approval from the Court, it is not uncommon that things happen, things change… Maybe something better comes up – and a better opportunity comes up. So yes, it’s a possibility.
Contrary to popular rumors, Chatham Borough need not build housing on the wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic Avenue, right next to our Memorial Park.
But the Mayor & Council will sacrifice that green lot anyway unless you tell them not to!
Starting 1 January 2026, the Borough can offer alternative ways to complete the new Housing Element of the Master Plan.
Q: Planning Board Member William Heap:Kendra, let’s say the Plan is adopted. It is approved. And somewhere down the line, somehow, magically, another piece of land appears. Is there room after approval for a little bit of horse trading?
A: Chatham Borough Planner Kendra Lelie:So, after the approval from the Court, it is not uncommon that things happen, things change… Maybe something better comes up – and a better opportunity comes up. So yes, it’s a possibility.
What can you do?Ask the Mayor & Borough Council:
What substantive steps have our Mayor & Council been taking to prepare to identify better alternatives to developing 58 North Passaic Avenue?
When will the Mayor & Borough Council begin to search for better alternatives?
This time, will the Mayor & Borough Council perform due diligence on all parcels, including sites the clandestine Affordable Housing Advisory Committee never gave proper consideration, as well as sites the Committee never considered at all?
Stop by the Council meeting, Monday, 8 September 2025, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. (Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level. Speaking is optional.)
Is it too late to preserve the wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic Avenue, right next to home plate at Memorial Park?No!
In case you haven’t heard, that lovely, green parcel is targeted for development under a controversial Master Plan amendment that also allows construction of up to 206 new apartments on the busy east end of Main Street.
In June, Hundreds of residents protested that plan, but to no avail.
If the Mayor & Council choose instead to sacrifice 58 North Passaic without having considered all the alternatives, they will lose the chance to achieve a better outcome for Chatham Borough.
To avoid that fate, the Mayor & Council must begin searching for better options immediately after Labor Day.
What are they doing about that?
What substantive steps have our Mayor & Council been taking to prepare to identify better alternatives to developing 58 North Passaic Avenue?
Stop by the Council meeting, Monday, 8 September 2025, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. (Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level. Speaking is optional.)
UPDATE: On June 18, the Planning Board rubber stamped the proposed Housing Element with only a minor adjustment, over the vocal objections of hundreds of residents, including petitioners and the overflow crowd in the Council Chamber. Five days later, several detailed the outrage at a Council meeting: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=396 (See multiple public comments starting 1:43:24 and Member Justin Strickland’s dissent starting approx. 2:11:00.)
We all love our Memorial Park, the green stretch behind our library, with its playground, pool, benches, lawn, and ball field, lined with big trees.
But now our Park is threatened by a Borough Council plan to sacrifice the green, vacant lot right next door – which the Borough bought for recreation – to build four apartments and a parking lot.
Here’s how that Borough-owned lot next to the ball field looks now:
Here’s what the Borough Council aims to build there asap:
Screenshot
Will that project pay property taxes to the Borough? No. It’s tax exempt.
That plan will also allow construction of 223 new apartments on the east end of Main Street, backing up traffic and jeopardizing the water supply in a wellhead protection zone that also includes Summit and Millburn.
What’s worse, despite having had at least fifteen months to come up with alternatives, our Mayor & Council never considered any. They left it until the last minute and dropped it on the Planning Board, half of which knows this is wrong, but may be steamrolled into accepting it for lack of a handy alternative.
Now the proponents of this nightmare simply insist that that Plan was the only way to meet a June 30 deadline set by state law.
That’s pure nonsense. NJ law does not require the Borough to make any such sacrifices.
And yet, that’s exactly what the Planning Board will do on June 18th unless you act now:
Drop everything right now and tell your elected officials NOT to sacrifices scarce Borough-owned recreation space but to meet the June 30 deadline while preserving the chance to vet a menu of alternatives at public meetings, before the Borough is locked into final choices:
Bring family, friends & neighbors to the Planning Board meeting, Wednesday, June 18th, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. Bring everyone, regardless of residence or age. (Use the north entrance. Take the elevator to the upper level.)
Write the Planning Board via Facebook or c/o Clerk, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue:
Thomas Belding Sophia Calcaterra-Hull Susan Favate William Heap
Susie Robertson Matthew Wagner Jonathan Wilcox Gregory Xikes
NJ law requires every town to provide for affordable housing. Chatham Borough does that.
NJ law does NOT require the Borough to pave over the green, wooded, Borough-owned, .3-acre, vacant lot at 58 North Passaic, right next to our Memorial Park, for a parking lot and four apartments, nor to impose an overlay zone allowing 220 more apartments on the east end of Main Street without having considered any alternatives.
Screenshot
But that’s what the Planning Board is going to do on June 18th unless you act now:
Tell your elected representatives mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org and Planning Board that we want to meet the June 30th deadline while preserving the chance to vet a broad menu of alternative, at public meetings, before the Borough is locked into final choices. Write:
Thomas Belding Sophia Calcaterra-Hull Susan FavateWilliam HeapSusie Robertson Matthew Wagner Jonathan Wilcox Gregory Xikes
Attend the Environmental Commission meeting to ask them to call for an chance to consider alternatives that would preserve the vacant, Borough-owned land: Wednesday, June 11th, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave. (Take the elevator to upper level, Room 301.)
Ask the Shade Tree Commission to call for alternatives that would preserve precious, mature, Borough-owned trees: shadetree@chathamborough.org
Ask the Recreation Advisory Committee to call for preserving the vacant lot for recreation as originally intended when the Borough bought it in the 1980s: Suzanne Jenks c/o Clerk, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Ave., Chatham, NJ.
Incredible but true: Our elected officials aim to sacrifice the little, green, wooded, Borough-owned lot at 58 North Passaic, right next to our Memorial Park, for two buildings, with four apartments and a parking lot.
On June 18th, the Planning Board will approve that development unless enough residents start emailing questions today to mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org, and go to the Planning Board meeting this Wednesday, June 4, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue, Chatham.
The Borough had that nearly 0.3-acre site on its wish list for 25 years before putting up taxpayer dollars to buy it for recreation. Check out the following clips from the November 15, 1981 issue of The Chatham Press and the November 17, 1981 issue of the Morristown Record:
Borough taxpayers shelled out $68,000 to acquire that land by deed dated March 31, 1982.
Now the Council is trying to steamroll the Planning Board into sacrificing that green lot by cramming in a 4-unit housing project and parking lot, to satisfy 4/6 of the Borough’s new affordable housing quota.
Screenshot
The Borough needs to consider other ways to satisfy its housing quota so that we can preserve that green, grassy, treed, Borough-owned lot.
You can help! Attend the Planning Board meeting on June 4, 7:30 pm, at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue. Chatham Borough. Use the north entrance and take the elevator to the upper level.
Showing up shows you care, even if you arrive late and leave early. Speaking is optional. Please bring a friend.
You won’t be able to ask questions if you Zoom the meeting, but it’s far better than not attending at all. Log in following the directions on the Borough home page www.chathamborough.org. Don’t log out even if you can’t pay attention.
Really tied up on June 4?Email the Mayor & Council right now:
Hearing conflicting claims about affordable housing? Like to separate the facts from spin & fiction?
Free ice cream at Scoops, a slice at Bucky’s, or coffee at Fleur de Sel for the first person who can find a factual error in the following post.
MYTH: Chatham Borough has a history of shirking its affordable housing obligations!
REALITY: Not so. The Borough has met its affordable housing quotas so far.
MYTH: Before June 30, Chatham must agree to build affordable housing on the green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot at 58 N. Passaic, right next to Memorial Park, or else the Borough will risk lawsuits that would destroy the town!
REALITY: Not so. Like virtually all other NJ municipalities, Chatham Borough has until the end of June to revise the Housing Element of its Master Plan to meet a new quota, but the Borough is NOT required to build anything on that particular green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park, and the Borough cannot be held liable for declining to let a developer build there.
MYTH: The Planning Board must have had a good reason for choosing to develop that green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park!
REALITY: No, the Planning Board did NOT select that lot for development. Only a few political bosses even heard about it before May 7, when a non-resident expert told the Planning Board about a proposal to change Borough policy by changing the Housing Element of the Master Plan, an amendment they won’t see until at least June 6, but will be steamrolled into adopting on June 18.Start approx. 46:00 here: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=368
MYTH: The Borough Council must have had a good reason for choosing to develop that green, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park!
REALITY: The Council did NOT vote to select that lot for development. Half the Council never heard about it until a few days before the Planning Board first heard about it on May 7. The Council never even mentioned it in public until the May 12 Council meeting, when residents started asking questions. The Mayor said they couldn’t talk about it, but the reason, if any, was not clear. If the Council can’t discuss a change in Borough policy, who can?
MYTH: There must be some explanation. Nobody would sacrifice a green, wooded, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park without having determined that it was the best – or only feasible – option.
REALITY: So far nobody’s shown any evidence that anybody considered any alternatives before targeting that green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park.The expert who presented the idea to the Planning Board said essentially, we owned that lot, and the developer wanted it, so we made a deal. Start approx. 1:09:00 here: https://chathamborough.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=1&clip_id=368
MYTH: The Environmental & Shade Tree Commissions must have approved targeting for development this green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned location right next to Memorial Park!
REALITY: No, neither Commission was even consulted. The Environmental Commission members who aren’t also political bosses didn’t hear about it until residents broke the news to them at the May 14 meeting. The only person on the Shade Tree Commission who knew about it was Council member Karen Korenkiewicz, who kept mum about it until a resident shocked the Shade Tree Commission with the news at its May 22 meeting.
MYTH: This wasn’t a secret, back-room deal, so there must be some record as to who chose that green, woodsy, vacant, Borough-owned lot and why!
REALITY: On May 7th the expert told the Planning Board the proposal was the work of a certain “advisory committee.” But the committee she credited with developing the proposal has NO public meetings, NO agendas, NO minutes, and takes NO public input. It isn’t even on the list of advisory committees on the Borough website as of yesterday.
MYTH: They’re going to do what they’re going to do. You can’t make any difference!
REALITY: Yes you can make a difference. You did it with the rolling reassessment, the peddler curfew, Post Office plaza, and the Middle School Arts Center. You can do it again. Our local leaders tend to consider their actions far more carefully when faced with strong public interest in an issue.
So whatever your views:
Talk to friends on the Council, Planning & Zoning Boards, and the Environmental & Shade Tree Commissions.
Write mayorcouncil@chathamborough.org and shadetree@chathamborough.org.
Attend or Zoom the Council meeting on Tuesday, 5/27/25 and Planning Board meeting on 6/4/25, both at 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue, upper level.
Who is responsible for the Master Plan amendment our Planning Board won’t see until June 6, but is under pressure to adopt on June18, setting Borough housing policy for the next ten years?
Why did our Borough Council let someone concoct such a plan 100% behind closed doors, without any public input?
Why does that plan include developing a vacant, green, woodsy, Borough-owned lot right next to Memorial Park?
58 N. Passaic Avenue
Was it ok for our Borough Council to skip presenting that plan in public, skip voting on it, skip running it by the Shade Tree Commission or Environmental Commission, and instead simply pay a hired planner to present a summary to our Planning Board?
Did the Council have an obligation to explain, release, or disclose the actual plan BEFORE turning it over to the Planning Board?
Did having the planner tell the Planning Board about the plan really muzzle the Borough Council as claimed?
Is the Planning Board required to approve the plan, which it won’t even see until at least June 6?
If the Planning Board is required to rubber stamp the never-before-seen plan, which the Council has never voted on or even discussed in public, then who is responsible for the policy decisions that will guide local decision making for the next ten years?
Why does the Council President say answering questions like that would expose her to “legal risk”?
Ask her: Jmathiasen@chathamborough.org
Ok with you if the Planning Board votes to develop that green, vacant, Borough-owned lot right next to the park without having justified or explained that choice?
UPDATE:There’s ONE more Council meeting before the political bosses steamroll our Planning Board into approving the sacrifice of the vacant, green, Borough-owned lot at 58 N. Passaic! ONE last chance to talk the Council off this ledge! That chance is TUESDAY, May 27, 2025, 7:30 pm, Borough Hall, 54 Main Street, upper level. (It’s set to start at 6:30 pm, but probably will be open to the public at approx. 7:30 pm.)
Great turnout at the May 12th Borough Council meeting. People showed up to hear and talk about the proposal to sacrifice this precious, Borough-owned, open, green lot at 58 North Passaic (just north of Memorial Field) to build an apartment project.
But who came up with this whole scheme? Who chose these particular sites? What else did they consider?
Why would they choose to develop this green, vacant, Borough-owned lot, right next to Memorial Field?
Why not put that apartment project at a better location, preferably on a lot that’s already developed?
Why didn’t we have a chance to weigh in on the decision? Why can’t we see the actual proposal until June 6? Why didn’t we even hear about it until May 4, more than a year after the new law kicked in?
Unless you can talk some sense into our leaders WELL BEFORE JUNE 18, they will do away with that little green space on North Passaic forever.
Last good chance to make a difference is the Council meeting on May 27th, 7:30 pm, at Borough Hall, 54 Fairmount Avenue.
